By Shannon Teoh, (c) 2016, Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. (c) 2016
Prime Minister Najib Razak remains safe from any criminal probe, and secure in office, after the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) blamed the financial troubles of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) on its former chief executive Shahrol Halmi.
But the bipartisan panel’s report tabled in Parliament on Thursday found that the management had invoked the Prime Minister’s authority, which is required for all major decisions, to circumvent instructions from the board of directors.
This requirement for the PM’s consent may yet mire Datuk Seri Najib in a slew of foreign investigations trying to find out whether millions of dollars had been siphoned from 1MDB.
While Mr Najib, who is also Finance Minister and 1MDB’s advisory chief, has resisted calls to resign for more than a year, he has to face an election by 2018, and recent opinion polls show that unhappiness with his government is at a record high.
Already the opposition has zeroed in on missing documents from the inquiry that leave overseas payments of up to US$5.5 billion (S$7.4 billion) unverified.
“Given that the allegations of impropriety by the Prime Minister, especially over the US$681 million ‘donation’ scandal, are all transacted overseas, there was no way… to clear the Prime Minister of these allegations,” opposition PAC member Tony Pua said yesterday, referring to money found in Mr Najib’s personal accounts that critics allege came from 1MDB.
Mr Najib has said the money was a political donation given by the Saudi royal family ahead of the 2013 General Election. Mr Najib and his allies in the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition have come out strongly to assert that the PAC report has exonerated him of any culpability.
But the PAC found that Datuk Shahrol had twice defied the board of directors by referring to Mr Najib’s instructions. The PAC also recommended that an internal regulation which requires the Prime Minister’s written approval for any major decision be removed, along with the advisory board he chairs.
Policy think-tank Ideas chief Wan Saiful Wan Jan told The Straits Times that all investigative bodies need to look at the PAC report, as there are grave issues concerning the corporate governance of 1MDB.
“If the whole board offered to resign, then the shadow directorship, or the ultimate shareholder, should take responsibility as well. The question not answered is the role of the PM in the debacle,” he said.
In one instance, Mr Shahrol referred to instructions from Mr Najib, as advisory board chief, in refusing to obtain a second opinion in evaluating the assets of a joint venture with PetroSaudi. The abortive deal is largely considered to be the start of 1MDB’s problems. Though the joint venture did not undertake any actual business activity, US$2.318 billion was shifted through various offshore accounts and used to pay firms that the PAC could not verify as being legitimate business partners.
But Mr Wan Saiful noted that the entire 1MDB saga is mired in convoluted financial dealings, which can be difficult for the layman to digest.
Said Rajaratnam School of International Studies senior fellow Oh Ei Sun: “It depends on whose narrative is better. It offers more bullets for the opposition heading into the election but whether they fire them accurately is another question.”
1MDB is also the subject of several foreign probes. Though details are scarce, the probe could be regarding international transactions, for which 1MDB failed to produce certifiable documentation to the PAC. US Justice Department officials were reported to have visited Kuala Lumpur while the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority’s chief executive Mark Branson said on Thursday that “evidence points to clear cases of corruption” in 1MDB.
These investigations, together with the doubts raised in the PAC report, may yet train the spotlight also on local enforcers such as the police, the anti-corruption agency and central bank – and have repercussions down the road for the Prime Minister.
See original post.